Showing posts with label Scripture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scripture. Show all posts

Saturday, October 13, 2012

Why were only eight people saved on the ark?

The Bible tells us that before the flood, people lived for many hundreds of years. Therefore the population of the earth was probably in the hundreds of millions, or even billions.1 The Bible also tells us that God saved only eight of these people, Noah, his sons, and their wives.


It is astounding to consider that in the tenth generation from Adam the human race had become so wicked, evil, violent and corrupt that it was not fit to go on living. Weren't there other people worth saving? The answer is, that all of us, "have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." (Romans 3:23By His standard, God would have condemned each and every person. So it is even more astounding that He did not! God chose to save Noah and his family, even though like all of us, they fell short of God's absolute standard of righteousness.

As Russell Grigg explains in Noah's Flood—why?:
God's mercy regarding the Flood is just as evident as His judgment, and is seen in the fact that God provided a way of escape for those who were prepared to believe what He had said, heed the warning He gave, and avail themselves of the means of salvation which He provided by instructing Noah to build the Ark (Genesis 6:14-16).

Noah is described as ... 'a preacher of righteousness' (2 Peter 2:5). His messages, perhaps preached from the platform of the partially completed Ark, included warnings of the coming judgment and invitations to his listeners to avail themselves of the one means of escape, which he was constructing. In the event, Noah and his family alone had regard to the wrath of God, and only eight people boarded the Ark in faith and were saved—Noah, his wife, his three sons, and their three wives.2
Noah and his family survived physically. As portrayed in The Coming Wrath, there were probably others who came to believe in Noah's prophecy. They wanted to reach the Ark, but they were killed before they could get there. They were sinners just like Noah, but like him, they repented and turned to God. From the testimony of the entire Bible, those who were killed in this way were also saved, not physically in this life, but toward eternal, everlasting life.

How is this relevant to us today?
The warnings given to Noah's generation are terrifyingly relevant today. When God's mercy is rejected, then His judgment must and will fall. But, as in the days of Noah, so now God has both given warning of the judgment to come and provided a way of salvation. The Ark was the only refuge from divine judgment then and it had to be entered by faith. As such it speaks to us of the Lord Jesus Christ, the only Saviour for sinful mankind today, whose death on the Cross must be appropriated by faith. 'For by grace are ye saved through faith' (Ephesians 2:8); 'Neither is there salvation in any other; for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved' (Acts 4:12). As the Apostle Paul declares, 'I declare unto you the Gospel...By which also ye are saved...how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that He rose again the third day' (1 Corinthians 15:1-4).2
(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 39: Sechiall Strikes of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:

References

1. Lambert Dolphin, World Population Since Creation, retrieved October 13, 2012.

2. Russell M. Grigg, Noah's Flood—why?, Creation Ministries International, retrieved October 13, 2012.

Where Is Noah’s Ark Today?

Then the ark rested in the seventh month, the seventeenth day of the month, on the mountains of Ararat (Genesis 8:4).
Mt. Ararat is the highest
mountain of the Ararat range
The Ark landed in mountains. The ancient name for these mountains could refer to several areas in the Middle East, such as Mt. Ararat in Turkey or other mountain ranges in neighboring countries.

Mt. Ararat has attracted the most attention because it has permanent ice, and some people report to have seen the Ark. Many expeditions have searched for the Ark there. There is no conclusive evidence of the Ark’s location or survival; after all, it landed on the mountains about 4,500 years ago. Also it could easily have deteriorated, been destroyed, or been used as lumber by Noah and his descendants.

Some scientists and Bible scholars, though, believe the Ark could indeed be preserved—perhaps to be providentially revealed at a future time as a reminder of the past judgment and the judgment to come, although the same could be said for things like the Ark of the Covenant or other biblical icons. Jesus said, “If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead” (Luke 16:31).

The Ark is unlikely to have survived without supernatural intervention, but this is neither promised nor expected from Scripture. However, it is a good idea to check if it still exists.

(Reposted from Ken Ham & Tim Lovett, Was There Really a Noah’s Ark & Flood?, October 11, 2007, AnswersInGenesis.org)

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 41: Jeriah's Choice of The Coming Wrath)


Discuss this post with us below, or here:

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Where Did All the Water Go?

And the waters receded continually from the earth. At the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters decreased (Genesis 8:3).
Simply put, the water from the Flood is in the oceans and seas we see today. Three-quarters of the earth’s surface is covered with water.

As even secular geologists observe, it does appear that the continents were at one time “together” and not separated by the vast oceans of today. The forces involved in the Flood were certainly sufficient to change all of this.

The supercontinent that existed before the Flood, according to the catastrophic plate tectonics model. The dark lines denote plate boundaries where continental crust is present or boundaries between continent and ocean where both exist on the same plate.
Scripture indicates that God formed the ocean basins, raising the land out of the water, so that the floodwaters returned to a safe place. (Some theologians believe Psalm 104 may refer to this event.) Some creation scientists believe that this breakup of the continent was part of the mechanism1 that ultimately caused the Flood.2

Some have speculated, because of Genesis 10:25, that the continental break occurred during the time of Peleg. However, this division is mentioned in the context of the Tower of Babel’s language division of the whole earth (Genesis 10–11). So the context points to a dividing of the languages and people groups, not the land breaking apart.

If there were a massive movement of continents during the time of Peleg, there would have been another worldwide flood. The Bible indicates that the mountains of Ararat existed for the Ark to land in them (Genesis 8:4); so the Indian-Australian Plate and Eurasian Plate had to have already collided, indicating that the continents had already shifted prior to Peleg.

(Reposted from Ken Ham & Tim Lovett, Was There Really a Noah’s Ark & Flood?, October 11, 2007, AnswersInGenesis.org)

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 41: Jeriah's Choice of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:

References

1. Andrew A. Snelling, Can Catastrophic Plate Tectonics Explain Flood Geology?, Answers in Genesis, November 8, 2007.

2. For more details on this subject see chapter 14 Can Catastrophic Plate Tectonics Explain Flood Geology? by Dr. Andrew A. Snelling, in Ken Ham, ed., The NEW Answers Book, Master Books, 2006.

Thursday, October 4, 2012

How Did Noah Care for All the Animals?

Just as God brought the animals to Noah by some form of supernatural means, He surely also prepared them for this amazing event. Creation scientists suggest that God gave the animals the ability to hibernate, as we see in many species today. Most animals react to natural disasters in ways that were designed to help them survive. It’s very possible many animals did hibernate, perhaps even supernaturally intensified by God.

Whether it was supernatural or simply a normal response to the darkness and confinement of a rocking ship, the fact that God told Noah to build rooms (“qen”—literally in Hebrew “nests”) in Genesis 6:14 implies that the animals were subdued or nesting. God also told Noah to take food for them (Genesis 6:21), which tells us that they were not in a year-long coma either.

 
Were we able to walk through the Ark as it was being built, we would undoubtedly be amazed at the ingenious systems on board for water and food storage and distribution. As Woodmorappe explains in Noah’s Ark: A Feasibility Study, a small group of farmers today can raise thousands of cattle and other animals in a very small space. One can easily imagine all kinds of devices on the Ark that would have enabled a small number of people to feed and care for the animals, from watering to waste removal.

As Woodmorappe points out, no special devices were needed for eight people to care for 16,000 animals. But if they existed, how would these devices be powered? There are all sorts of possibilities. How about a plumbing system for gravity-fed drinking water, a ventilation system driven by wind or wave motion, or hoppers that dispense grain as the animals eat it? None of these require higher technology than what we know existed in ancient cultures. And yet these cultures were likely well-short of the skill and capability of Noah and the pre-Flood world.

(Reposted from Ken Ham & Tim Lovett, Was There Really a Noah’s Ark & Flood?, October 11, 2007, AnswersInGenesis.org)

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 20: Walking Away of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:

Saturday, September 29, 2012

How Is Christ like the Ark?

For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost (Matthew 18:11).
As God’s Son, the Lord Jesus Christ is like Noah’s Ark. Jesus came to seek and to save the lost. Just as Noah and his family were saved by the Ark, rescued by God from the floodwaters, so anyone who believes in Jesus as Lord and Savior will be spared from the coming final judgment of mankind, rescued by God from the fire that will destroy the earth after the last days (2 Peter 3:7).

Noah and his family had to go through a doorway into the Ark to be saved, and the Lord shut the door behind them (Genesis 7:16). So we too have to go through a “doorway” to be saved so that we won’t be eternally separated from God. The Son of God, Jesus, stepped into history to pay the penalty for our sin of rebellion. Jesus said, “I am the door. If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture” (John 10:9).

(Reposted from Ken Ham & Tim Lovett, Was There Really a Noah’s Ark & Flood?, October 11, 2007, AnswersInGenesis.org)

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 37: New Path of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:

Did Noah’s father really die 5 years before the Flood?

In John K. Reed's book The Coming Wrath, Noah's father and grandfather both die shortly before the Flood. Lamech dies 5 years beforehand, and Methuselah less than a year. Is this just fiction, to make for a good story?

In the book of Genesis, the first book of the Bible, in chapter 5, we are given a detailed list of Adam and all his descendants, all the way up to Noah. We are told how long each lived, and how old they were when their sons were born. Genesis 11 continues with Noah and all of his descendants, up until Terah, the father of Abraham.

If you turn this into graphical form, you will get a graph like this:

Yes, Lamech and Methuselah were real men. According to the true testimony of the Bible, Lamech died 5 years before the Flood, and Methuselah one year beforehand. In his work of historical fiction, John K. Reed is faithful to this.

The Bible does not tell us how they died. Could it have happened the way it is portrayed in The Coming Wrath? You be the judge.

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 23: Death Dream of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:

For more info, see Bodie Hodge, Ancient Patriarchs in Genesis, Answers in Genesis, January 20, 2009.

Friday, September 28, 2012

Slavery before the Flood?

In The Coming Wrath, the first book of the Lost Worlds Trilogy, the warlord Delonias captures twelve Nephilim boys in battle to become slaves. He sends the most promising one, Sechiall, to Jared. Is it realistic that slavery as an institution was already established before the Flood of Noah's day?

Let us consider the most ancient written historical records that are available to us.

In ancient Babylon, in the land of Mesopotamia (currently Iraq), "The Code of Hammurabi, from Babylon in the 18th century BC, gives chilling details of the different Rewards and penalties for surgeons operating on free men or slaves."1

Egyptian slaves
In ancient Egypt, from the very 1st dynasty before the year 2000 BC, "Hem (Hm), generally translated as 'slave' and originally meaning body, was seemingly a person with lessened rights dedicated to a certain task such as the service of a god or the royal administration."2,3

In ancient India, "the institution of slavery originated in India when the Aryans captured a number of dasas in the battle. According to Mahabharata it is a law of war that the vanquished should become slave of the victor and should serve his captor until ransomed. In course of time certain other categories of slaves also came into existence. For-example children born to a slave automatically became the slaves of the same masters."4

In ancient China, "Slaves occupied a large portion of the population in ancient China since 2,100 BC, when Xia Dynasty started."5

Thus we see from the earliest records of the great civilizations, slavery was an evil presence in all of them. Is there somewhere a common thread here?

Yes! The Bible supplies us with many valuable clues, that historians ignore at the detriment of their own profession.

There are two events that the Bible records in detail which occurred before all of these ancient civilizations. They are the global Flood of Noah's day, and only four generation later, the Tower of Babel. The book of Genesis tells us about the worldwide flood which Noah, his family of eight, and all land creatures survived through God's provision of the Ark. Noah's, his three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth, and their wives lived on to tell the next generations many true stories about what the world was like before the Flood.

Tower of Babel?
Nimrod, the grandson of Ham, was a mighty ruler who built great cities in the land of Mesopotamia, among them Babylon (also known as Babel), Uruk, Akkad and Kalneh, in the area of Shinar, and Nineveh, Rehoboth Ir, Calah and Resen in the area of Assyria (Genesis 10:9-11). By this time, most of the newer generations no longer had faith in the Creator God in the way Noah and his family did. Instead, they followed Nimrod. They "wanted to make a name for themselves." As told in the Bible's book of Genesis chapter 11, at the city of Babel which Nimrod built:
They said to each other, “Come, let’s make bricks and bake them thoroughly.” They used brick instead of stone, and tar for mortar. Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves; otherwise we will be scattered over the face of the whole earth.”

But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower the people were building. The Lord said, “If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other.”

So the Lord scattered them from there over all the earth, and they stopped building the city. That is why it was called Babel —because there the Lord confused the language of the whole world. From there the Lord scattered them over the face of the whole earth. (Genesis 11:3-8)
The Tower of Babel account explains many things. Shortly afterward we see four separate advanced civilizations springing up: in Babylon, Egypt, India, and China. All of them had slavery! Though God confused their languages, he did not take away their memory. It is likely that the Tower of Babel itself was built by slave labor (!), spurred on by the leadership of men such as Nimrod.

Did Nimrod and his followers come up with the idea of slavery themselves? Perhaps. But it is extremely likely that they heard all about slavery and the evils that resulted from it from their forefathers Shem, Ham, and Japheth, and from Noah himself who was still alive at the time. (From clues in Chinese history, after the Tower of Babel incident, Noah with one of the scattered groups to China, and lived out the remainder of his years there.6)

Genesis chapter 6 paints a brief picture of the world prior to the Flood. We are told "The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time." (Genesis 6:5). The fact that slavery was an integral part of the earliest historic civilizations in Babylon, Egypt, India, and China, points to the presence of slavery before the Flood. Slavery was very likely one huge area of the "wickedness of the human race" that brought the Flood judgment upon them.

Yet God extended his grace and mercy to Noah and his family, knowing that their descendants Nimrod and his adversaries would hear about the evil of slavery before the Flood, and like the idea! Knowing that the Tower of Babel would be built by slaves. Knowing that wickedness would once again be widespread upon the earth?! This is the topic of Mystery of Lawlessness, the third book of the Lost Worlds Trilogy.

God extends his grace and mercy to sinful people today, if they turn to him in repentance and accept the give of Jesus Christ's sacrifice on the cross for our behalf. This makes this all so extremely relevant to people of every day and age, including for us today.

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 7: Protégé of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:

written by Marko Malyj

References 

1. History of Slavery, An Evil of Civilization, History World, retrieved 1/16/2013.

2. Slavery in Ancient Egypt, An introduction to the history and culture of Pharaonic Egypt, retrieved 1/16/2013.

3. Jimmy Dunn, Slaves and Slavery in Ancient Egypt , http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/slaves.htm, retrieved 1/16/2013.

4. Srouti Modha, Essay on system of slavery in Ancient India, retrieved 1/16/2013.

5. Slavery in Ancient China, Slaveryinjustice blog, retrieved 1/16/2013.

6. Roy L. Hales, Archaeology, The Bible and The Post-Flood Origins of Chinese History, retrieved 1/26/2013.

Monday, September 24, 2012

How Could Noah Round Up So Many Animals?

"Of the birds after their kind, of animals after their kind, and of every creeping thing of the earth after its kind, two of every kind will come to you, to keep them alive." (Genesis 6:20)
This verse tells us that Noah didn’t have to search or travel to far away places to bring the animals on board. The world map was completely different before the Flood, and on the basis of Genesis 1, there may have been only one continent. The animals simply arrived at the Ark as if called by a “homing instinct” (a behavior implanted in the animals by their Creator) and marched up the ramp, all by themselves.

Though this was probably a supernatural event (one that cannot be explained by our understanding of nature), compare it to the impressive migratory behavior we see in some animals today. We are still far from understanding all the marvelous animal behaviors exhibited in God’s creation: the migration of Canada geese and other birds, the amazing flights of Monarch butterflies, the annual travels of whales and fish, hibernation instincts, earthquake sensitivity, and countless other fascinating capabilities of God’s animal kingdom.

(Reposted from Ken Ham & Tim Lovett, Was There Really a Noah’s Ark & Flood?, October 11, 2007, AnswersInGenesis.org)

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 36: Migration of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Was Noah’s Flood Global?

And the waters prevailed exceedingly on the earth, and all the high hills under the whole heaven were covered. The waters prevailed fifteen cubits upward, and the mountains were covered (Genesis 7:19–20). 
A local flood?
Many Christians today claim that the Flood of Noah’s time was only a local flood. These people generally believe in a local flood because they have accepted the widely believed evolutionary history of the earth, which interprets fossil layers as the history of the sequential appearance of life over millions of years.1

Scientists once understood the fossils, which are buried in water-carried sediments of mud and sand, to be mostly the result of the great Flood. Those who now accept millions of years of gradual accumulation of fossils have, in their way of thinking, explained away the evidence for the global Flood. Hence, many compromising Christians insist on a local flood.

Secularists deny the possibility of a worldwide Flood at all. If they would think from a biblical perspective, however, they would see the abundant evidence for the global Flood. As someone once quipped, “I wouldn’t have seen it if I hadn’t believed it.”

Those who accept the evolutionary timeframe, with its fossil accumulation, also rob the Fall of Adam of its serious consequences. They put the fossils, which testify of disease, suffering, and death, before Adam and Eve sinned and brought death and suffering into the world. In doing this, they also undermine the meaning of the death and resurrection of Christ. Such a scenario also robs all meaning from God’s description of His finished creation as “very good.”

If the Flood only affected the area of Mesopotamia, as some claim, why did Noah have to build an Ark? He could have walked to the other side of the mountains and escaped. Most importantly, if the Flood were local, people not living in the vicinity of the Flood would not have been affected by it. They would have escaped God’s judgment on sin.

In addition, Jesus believed that the Flood killed every person not on the Ark. What else could Christ mean when He likened the coming world judgment to the judgment of “all” men in the days of Noah (Matthew 24:37–39)?

In 2 Peter 3, the coming judgment by fire is likened to the former judgment by water in Noah’s Flood. A partial judgment in Noah’s day, therefore, would mean a partial judgment to come.
If the Flood were only local, how could the waters rise to 20 feet (6 m) above the mountains (Genesis 7:20)? Water seeks its own level; it could not rise to cover the local mountains while leaving the rest of the world untouched.

Even what is now Mt. Everest was once covered with water and uplifted afterward.2 If we even out the ocean basins and flatten out the mountains, there is enough water to cover the entire earth by about 1.7 miles (2.7 km).3 Also important to note is that, with the leveling out of the oceans and mountains, the Ark would not have been riding at the height of the current Mt. Everest, thus no need for such things as oxygen masks either.

There’s more. If the Flood were a local flood, God would have repeatedly broken His promise never to send such a flood again. God put a rainbow in the sky as a covenant between God and man and the animals that He would never repeat such an event. There have been huge local floods in recent times (e.g., in Bangladesh); but never has there been another global Flood that killed all life on the land.

(Reposted from Ken Ham & Tim Lovett, Was There Really a Noah’s Ark & Flood?, October 11, 2007, AnswersInGenesis.org)

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 16: Reaction of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:
References
  1. For compelling evidence that the earth is not billions of years old, read The Young Earth by Dr. John Morris and Thousands ... not Billions by Dr. Don DeYoung; also see www.answersingenesis.org/go/young.
  2. Mount Everest is more than 5 miles (8 km) high. How, then, could the Flood have covered “all the mountains under the whole heaven?” Before the Flood, the mountains were not so high. The mountains today were formed only towards the end of, and after, the Flood by collision of the tectonic plates and the associated up-thrusting. In support of this, the layers that form the uppermost parts of Mt. Everest are themselves composed of fossil-bearing, water-deposited layers. For more on this, see Chapter 14 on catastrophic plate tectonics.
  3. A.R. Wallace, Man’s Place in the Universe, McClure, Phillips & Co, New York, 1903, 225–226; www.wku.edu/~smithch/wallace/S728-3.htm.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

How Large Was Noah’s Ark?

"The length of the ark shall be three hundred cubits, its width fifty cubits, and its height thirty cubits." (Genesis 6:15)
Unlike many whimsical drawings that depict the Ark as some kind of overgrown houseboat (with giraffes sticking out the top), the Ark described in the Bible was a huge vessel. Not until the late 1800s was a ship built that exceeded the capacity of Noah’s Ark.


The dimensions of the Ark are convincing for two reasons: the proportions are like that of a modern cargo ship, and it is about as large as a wooden ship can be built. The cubit gives us a good indication of size.1 With the cubit’s measurement, we know that the Ark must have been at least 450 feet (137 m) long, 75 feet (23 m) wide, and 45 feet (14 m) high. In the Western world, wooden sailing ships never got much longer than about 330 feet (100 m), yet the ancient Greeks built vessels at least this size 2,000 years earlier. China built huge wooden ships in the 1400s that may have been as large as the Ark. The biblical Ark is one of the largest wooden ships of all time—a mid-sized cargo ship by today’s standards.

(Reposted from Ken Ham & Tim Lovett, Was There Really a Noah’s Ark & Flood?, October 11, 2007, AnswersInGenesis.org)

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 11: Master Builder of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:

Reference

1. The cubit was defined as the length of the forearm from elbow to fingertip. Ancient cubits vary anywhere from 17.5 inches (45 cm) to 22 inches (56 cm), the longer sizes dominating the major ancient constructions. Despite this, even a conservative 18 inch (46 cm) cubit describes a sizeable vessel.

How Long Is a Cubit?

The cubit is one of the earliest known standards of length, used in ancient Israel and throughout the Near East. It was originally the length of one’s forearm between the tip of the middle finger and the elbow. The word cubit comes from the Latin word for elbow and the Hebrew term refers to the forearm. The term occurs more than one hundred times in the Old and New Testaments to describe structures and distances.

Nations varied somewhat in defining the cubit's exact length, and both short cubits and long or royal cubits were common. Dual cubit values in Egypt were 17.72 and 20.67 inches, as determined from measuring sticks found in tombs. In Babylon, 20.806 inches was a common cubit length (Achtemeier, 1985).

Cubit measuring rods such as these from the Eighteenth Dynasty tomb of Aperia would have been common tools in the quarries and at the pyramid construction site (Photo by Jon Bodsworth)

There is a fascinating clue to the length of the cubit from the Old Testament and archaeology. Hezekiah’s famous Siloam water tunnel is referenced in 2 Kings 20:20 and 2 Chronicles 32:3–4. It was built around 700 B.C. to provide water for Jerusalem during a siege by the Assyrians under Sennacherib. This tunnel is hewn from solid rock and is a memorable hike for visitors to the old city of Jerusalem. When I walked the tunnel in 1995 by flashlight, there was a foot depth of moving water along the entire length of one-third mile, or 1,749 feet.

Originally there was a carved inscription near the tunnel outlet into the Pool of Siloam within the city wall. This Siloam Inscription, now in the Archaeology Museum of Istanbul, Turkey, records the tunnel length as 1,200 cubits. Comparison with the actual length yields a cubit measure of about 17.5 inches.

With a 17.5-inch value for the cubit, Noah’s Ark measures an impressive 437.5 feet long, 72.92 feet wide, and 43.75 feet high (300x50x30 cubits; Genesis 6:15). The Ark may well have been the largest building project in history up to that time. Also, the biblical giant Goliath was over six cubits tall (l Samuel 17:4), or nine feet.

(re-posted from Don DeYoung, How Long Is a Cubit?, published in Creation Matters, a publication of Creation Research Society, Volume 17, Number 5, September/October 2012, to appear at http://www.creationresearch.org/creation_matters/pdf/2012/CM17%2005%20low%20res.pdf)

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 11: Master Builder of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:
Reference
Achtemeier, P.J. (ed.) 1985. Harper’s Bible Dictionary. Harper & Row, San Francisco.

Monday, September 10, 2012

Why would God destroy His own creation?

The global flood of Noah's day was not a natural occurrence - it was truly an "act of God." If God created the world with all its beauty, why then would such a good Creator destroy His own creation?

We are given the answer in God's own word, the Bible. In Genesis 6:5 we read that "The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually."

God's purpose was not to destroy the earth with the flood. It was to destroy the wickedness upon it. The people of that time were ignoring the Creator and seeking their own pleasures.

God did not send judgment immediately. He gave the people of Noah's time 120 years to prepare for judgment and repent of their sin. God was willing to save everyone who would turn back to Him. But the rebellion was so universal among men that by the end of the 120 years the only people alive who obeyed the Creator and followed Him were Noah, his three sons, and their wives. Eight people in all....

Throughout the Bible, God shows his patience repeatedly. He gave the Canaanites 400 years to repent of their ways while Abraham's descendants had left Canaan to live in Egypt. It was not until the Canaanites' sin "reached its full measure" that God brought the Israelites back, to become the instruments of their destruction. (Genesis 15:13-16).

On another occasion, God sent the prophet Jonah to Ninevah to announce destruction upon that evil city within 40 days (Jonah 3:4). But unlike the Canaanites or the people of Noah's time, the Ninevites actually heeded the warning! They repented as a group - and God did not carry out judgment that He had threatened.

In the days of Noah, Abraham, and Jonah, God set forth definite expiration dates for people to come back to Him. God's patience is limited by His righteousness and holiness - He does not tolerate willful rebellion that goes on indefinitely. At other periods of history, such as our own, we do not know the amount of time He is allowing for a true change of heart. It has been almost two thousand years since God's own Son, Jesus, told us what will happen at the end of the world, which is when He will return:
For as were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. (Matthew 24:37-39)
Yet, Jesus hung on the cross and prayed these words: "Forgive them, for they know not what they do" (Luke 23:34). We need that same forgiveness today! We can thank the Lord that the world is still here so that we could be born. Even more so, we can thank Him that He gives everyone the opportunity to accept His gift of eternal life, or to reject it.

So for us, the Creator's judgment by flood almost five thousand years ago is a sign of His grace to this day. He has the power to judge us. He is patient. He will rejoice over those who turn back to Him - and He will save them from ... the Coming Wrath.

Written by Marko Malyj

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 16: Reaction of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Did people really live 900 years before the Flood?

Many people find it difficult to believe that Methuselah lived to be 969 years old. Nevertheless, the Bible teaches quite plainly that the early patriarchs often lived to be nearly 1,000 years old and even had children when they were several hundred years old!


(selections from Dr. David Menton & Dr. Georgia Purdom, Did People Like Adam and Noah Really Live Over 900 Years of Age? Answers in Genesis, May 27, 2010)

For 1,500 years after creation, men lived such long lives that most were either contemporaries of the first man, Adam, or personally knew someone who was. The ten patriarchs (excluding Enoch) who preceded the Great Flood lived an average of 912 years. Lamech died the youngest at the age of 777, and Methuselah lived to be the oldest at 969.

During the 1,000 years following the Flood, however, the Bible records a progressive decline in the life span of the patriarchs, from Noah who lived to be 950 years old until Abraham at 175 (see figure 1 and table 2). In fact, Moses was unusually old for his time (120 years) because, when he reflected on the brevity of life, he said: “The days of our lives are seventy years; and if by reason of strength they are eighty years, yet their boast is only labor and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away” (Psalm 90:10).

The precipitous plunge in life spans after the Flood suggests that something changed at the time of the Flood, or shortly thereafter, that was responsible for this decline.

Biological Causes of Aging

In the 1900's it was believed that our normal living cells, if properly nourished, could grow and divide indefinitely outside our body. In 1961, this idea was refuted by Leonard Hayflick, who grew human cells outside the body in covered glass dishes containing the necessary nutrients. Hayflick discovered that cells cultured in this way normally died after about 50 cell divisions (Hayflick’s limit). This suggests that even the individual cells of our body are mortal, apart from any other bodily influence.

Both aging and life span are processes that have genetic determinants that are overlapping and unique. Approximately 20–30 percent of factors affecting life span are thought to be heritable and thus genetic.1 Life span varies greatly among individuals, indicating that while aging plays a role, other factors are also involved.

Although many genetic factors are suggested to affect aging and life span, these processes largely remain a mystery. Aging can be thought of as increased susceptibility to internal (i.e., agents that damage DNA) and external (i.e., disease-causing bacteria) stressors because of a decrease in the maintenance, repair, and defensive systems of the body.

For example, DNA repair systems are needed to protect the genome (all our DNA) from mutation. Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a genetic disorder caused by a deficient (due to mutations) DNA repair system that normally repairs mutations caused by ultraviolet light. Individuals with this disease must severely limit their exposure to sunlight. Outer surfaces of the body such as skin and lips commonly show signs of premature aging.2 While this is an extreme example, any mutation that decreases the efficiency of our maintenance, repair, and defensive systems will likely lead to more rapid aging and decreased life span.

Telomeres, long, repetitive sequences of DNA at the ends of human chromosomes, are also thought to play an important role in aging. With each division of the cell, telomeres shorten due to the inability of the enzyme that copies the DNA to go all the way to the end of the chromosome.3 When telomeres have become too short, the cell stops dividing. This limitation plausibly serves as a quality control mechanism. Older cells will have accumulated many mutations in their DNA, and their continued division may lead to diseases like cancer. Most body cells cannot replicate indefinitely, leading to aging and eventually death. Thus, telomeres are important in determining the life span of cell types that directly affect aging.

Genetic determinants of life span or longevity are difficult to pinpoint. Even if the genes are determined to be associated with people who live for many years, their actual role in increasing life span is unknown. Genetic studies of centarians (people who have lived more than 100 years) have produced several possible candidate longevity genes. The gene for apolipoprotein E (APOE), important in the regulation of cholesterol, has certain alleles that are more common among centarians.4 This is also true for certain alleles of insulinlike growth factor 1 (IGF1), important in cell proliferation and cell death, and superoxide dismutases (SOD), important in the breakdown of agents that damage DNA.4 Possibly the alleles associated with the centarians more closely reflect the genetic makeup of individuals with a long life span 6,000 years ago. Still, these alleles show the effects of the curse if the highest achievable age today is around 120 years!

Eternal Life

Long life spans are found in the secular literature of several ancient cultures (including the Babylonians, Greeks, Romans, Indians, and Chinese). But even a life span of nearly 1,000 years is sadly abbreviated when we consider that God initially created us to live forever.

According to the Bible, God created the first humans—Adam and Eve—without sin and with the ability to live forever. God gave the first human couple everything they needed for their eternal health and happiness in the Garden of Eden; but He warned them not to eat fruit from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil or they would die, as indeed would all their descendants after them (Genesis 2:16–17). When Satan’s deception prompted Eve to disobey this command and then Adam willfully disobeyed, their minds and bodies profoundly changed (Genesis 3). Not only did they become subject to death, but their firstborn child (Cain) became the world’s first murderer. Truly, the wages of sin is death, physically and spiritually. It is sobering to think that the Bible would have been only a few pages long—from creation to the fall into sin—were it not for the undeserved love of God who both promised and sent the Messiah to save us from sin and death (Genesis 3:15; Isaiah 25:8; Psalm 49:14–15; 1 John 5:13).

The important point is that science offers no hope for eternal life, or even for the significant lengthening of life. It has been estimated that if complete cures, or preventions, were found for the three major killers (cancer, stroke, and coronary artery disease), the maximum life span of man would still not increase (although more people would approach this maximum). And such long-lived people would still become progressively weaker with age, as critical components of their body continue to deteriorate.

We may conclude that God’s Word, not science, has the complete solution to the problem of aging and death. The solution has been “revealed by the appearing of our Savior Jesus Christ, who has abolished death and brought life and immortality to light through the gospel” (2 Timothy 1:10).

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 2: Nightmare of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:

References (selected)

1. T. Perls and D. Terry, “Genetics of Exceptional Longevity,” Experimental Gerontology 38 (2003): 725–730. 

2. DermNet NZ, “Xeroderma pigmentosum,” www.dermnetnz.org/systemic/xeroderma-pigmentosum.html

3. P. Monaghan and M. Haussmann, “Do Telomere Dynamics Link Lifestyle and Lifespan?” TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution 21 (2006): 47–53.

4. K. Christensen et al., “The Quest for Genetic Determinants of Human Longevity: Challenges and Insights,” Nature Reviews Genetics 7 (2006): 436–448.

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Prophecy: True or False?

Mayan calendar
People are fascinated by prophecies. For example, the Mayan calendar came to an end on Friday, December 21, 2012. Some prophesied that the end of the world would happen on that day. Most people scoffed at this, since false prophesies like this have come and gone, and are too many to count. But the Mayan-inspired prophesies did make for many entertaining shows on cable TV, and sold a lot of advertising.

Isn’t the Bible just another collection of such false prophecies? According to Christians the answer is No - because God Himself has inspired the words of Holy Scripture! This concept of inspiration is called Biblical Inerrancy.

At times we all sense the presence of God through the beautiful world of nature. Only an atheist would dispute this. But God has also revealed Himself in very special ways, as recorded in the Bible, such as:

God spoke to Moses
in the burning bush.
God revealed Himself to the prophets through dreams and visions. Sometimes God suggested His messages by an internal operation of the Holy Spirit on their hearts and minds. At other times, He spoke in an audible voice.

The Bible tells us how to distinguish between true and false prophecy. "When a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the Lord has not spoken" (Deuteronomy 18:22).

Noah was one of the people that God communicated to in this way. In his case God spoke audibly on more than one occasion, as recorded in Genesis 6:13 and other passages in Biblical book of Genesis. Noah was a true prophet, not a false one, because the words that He relayed from God came true. The account of the Bilblical Flood bears this out. It is very sad that only eight people accepted God's refuge, and survived the ark to see the prophecy come true...

The beauty of God’s nature around us is not enough for us to understand God, because of spiritual blindness that stains every single person. But the prophecies, miracles, and the entire message of Scripture speak to our spiritual need. They reveal to us what we need to know about God. Ultimately they show us how He saves us from our sin by leading us to believe in the one He has sent, His Son Jesus Christ.

Christians understand that in a greater sense, the entire Bible is God’s Word to us. It is God’s special revelation, using the language of words, given to us as a special gift from our Creator.

Noah prophesied a global flood, not the end of the world. But Jesus told us that the world will indeed come to an end, at a day and hour that only God the Father knows. It is truly a gift from God to know that we can be saved from this calamity, just as God saved all those who took refuge in the ark.

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 15: Revelations of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:
written by Marko Malyj

Reference

Louis Berkhof, Summary of Christian Doctrine, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 1938, 13-16.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Who were the Nephilim?

According to Rich Deem, there is somewhat of a controversy in Christianity regarding the identification of the Nephilim mentioned in the Genesis flood account (Genesis 6:2-4). Were the Nephilim a race of giants that existed before and after the flood or is the word just a generic term describing large strong people?

Let's look at the Scripture passage in question, in context:

Now it came about, when men began to multiply on the face of the land, and daughters were born to them, that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose. Then the LORD said, "My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, because he also is flesh; nevertheless his days shall be one hundred and twenty years." The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown. Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. (Genesis 6:1-5)
Since the Bible indicates that angels are asexual beings, it makes sense that they could not be the "sons of God" who produced children with the "daughters of men." The best interpretation is that the "sons of God" were men who were descended from Seth, who followed the Lord for a time (in contrast to the line of Cain, which produced the "daughters of men"). However, right before the flood, even the "sons of God" took wives among the line of Cain, and, therefore, became corrupted themselves through their unbelieving wives. This is one of the reasons God determined to destroy the entire human race, except for the eight people who still followed the Lord (Noah and his extended family).

Genesis 6 also describes the Nephilim, who were the corrupt strongmen of their time, notorious for their violent exploits (Genesis 6:4). These men were probably also descendents of Cain, who were terrorizing the peoples and represented at least part of the group whose thoughts were "only evil continually." The Nephilim that were described after the flood were also evil strongmen, but not related to those pre-flood people, since they were all destroyed in the flood.

(For historical fiction that touches on this topic, see Chapter 1: Lion Cub of The Coming Wrath)

Discuss this post with us below, or here:

(extracted from Who Were the Nephilim and Sons of God?, by Rich Deem, GodAndScience.org)